US Discussing Options to Acquire Greenland, Including Military Action: What We Know So Far
- David S
- Jan 7
- 4 min read
The White House has confirmed that President Donald Trump is considering a range of options to acquire Greenland, including the potential use of military force, calling it a US national security priority. The remarks have triggered strong reactions across Europe, raised questions about NATO unity, and reignited debate over sovereignty, international law, and Arctic geopolitics.
This article breaks down what’s happening, why Greenland matters, what options are being discussed, and what comes next.
Why Is the US Interested in Greenland?
Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, occupies a strategically critical position in the Arctic. As climate change melts ice caps, the region is becoming increasingly valuable for defence, shipping routes, energy resources, and rare earth minerals.
Key Strategic Factors
Arctic security: Growing military and commercial activity by Russia and China
Geographic advantage: Control over North Atlantic and Arctic sea lanes
Natural resources: Rare earth elements, oil, gas, and minerals
Existing US presence: A long-standing American military base already operates in Greenland
President Trump has repeatedly argued that the US “needs” Greenland for security reasons, first raising the idea during his initial term in 2019.
What Did the White House Say?
In a statement to the BBC, the White House confirmed:
“The president and his team are discussing a range of options…and of course, utilizing the US military is always an option at the Commander-in-Chief’s disposal.”
Officials framed the issue as a foreign policy and national security concern, not merely an economic or diplomatic matter.
What Options Are Being Considered?
According to US officials speaking to Reuters and other outlets, Washington is evaluating multiple pathways.
Possible US Options
Outright purchase of Greenland from Denmark
Compact of Free Association, similar to agreements with Pacific island states
Expanded military and commercial presence
Diplomatic pressure backed by security arguments
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio later told lawmakers that there are no plans to invade Greenland, though discussions about purchasing the territory have taken place.
Europe and Denmark Push Back Strongly
European leaders moved quickly to show unity behind Denmark.
Joint European Statement
Leaders from the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Denmark said:
Greenland belongs to its people
Only Denmark and Greenland can decide its future
Any changes must respect international law and territorial integrity
Arctic security should be handled collectively within NATO
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any US attack on Greenland would effectively end NATO as it exists today.
Greenland’s Leaders Reject Annexation
Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed European support but stressed the need for calm, lawful dialogue.
“Greenland’s status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity.”
Although many Greenlanders favor eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the United States.
Local voices have expressed fear following recent US military action in Venezuela, worrying Greenland could face similar pressure.
NATO Unity Under Pressure
NATO’s core principle is collective defence an attack on one ally is an attack on all. Any US military move against Greenland, a territory of NATO member Denmark, would create an unprecedented crisis within the alliance.
This has raised broader concerns about:
Alliance credibility
US leadership within NATO
Western unity amid rising global tensions
Why Greenland Matters More Now Than Before
Rising Arctic Competition
Russia expanding Arctic military infrastructure
China increasing economic and scientific activity
New shipping routes emerging due to melting ice
Rare Earths and Resources
Greenland holds untapped rare earth deposits, critical for:
Defense technology
Electric vehicles
Renewable energy systems
These factors explain why interest in Greenland has intensified in recent years.
What Happens Next?
Diplomatic talks are expected between:
The US Secretary of State
Danish and Greenlandic officials
Denmark’s foreign minister said discussions should clear up “misunderstandings,” though Greenland’s leaders insist sovereignty is non-negotiable.
For now, the situation remains politically volatile but diplomatically active, with no confirmed military action planned.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can the US legally take Greenland?
No. Under international law and the UN Charter, Greenland’s sovereignty cannot be altered without consent from Greenland and Denmark.
Is the US planning to invade Greenland?
US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, say there are no plans to invade, though military options were discussed in principle.
Why is Greenland strategically important?
Its Arctic location, natural resources, and proximity to major shipping and military routes make it geopolitically valuable.
Do Greenlanders want to join the US?
No. Surveys show strong opposition to becoming part of the United States, despite interest in independence from Denmark.
Would this affect NATO?
Yes. Any military action against Greenland could severely damage or even fracture NATO.
Final Takeaway
The renewed US push to acquire Greenland highlights how Arctic geopolitics, national security, and international law are colliding in an era of global competition. While Washington frames the issue as a strategic necessity, Europe and Greenland see it as a test of sovereignty and alliance trust.
What happens next will shape not only Greenland’s future, but the credibility of NATO and the rules-based international order.
Comments